Comments on: Hermeneutics in the Blogosphere

By: mike

mike — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:02:35 +0000

yeah i’m looking forward to your thoughts on coherence as well. gurus miss that stuff like that plague

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:25:00 +0000

I’ll look forward to hearing more.

By: Josh Mann

Josh Mann — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:58:41 +0000

Great. Briefly, my interest in ‘coherence’ is that it can be an exegetical key used in both a grammatical-historical method and a reader-response method (i.e., internal coherence of a text or internal coherence of a reader’s interpretation).

By: Only two approaches to the biblical text are coherent (Schenck) « Confluence: Ben Byerly's Muddy Mix

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:47:17 +0000

[...] “coherent,” unless you want to say that it is trying to making some kind of attempt at internal coherence (perceived coherence?). Not that anyone will necessarily agree on the results of the [...]

By: Ben Byerly

Ben Byerly — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:44:30 +0000

I hope you do take up the topic of “coherence.” I was fumbling around; maybe “perceived coherence” would be . I’ll take a look at your earlier posts.