<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Sheffield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/</link>
	<description>Biblical Studies, Exegesis, Theology, etc. by Josh Mann</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/comment-page-1/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=748#comment-507</guid>
		<description>Stephanie, I&#039;m glad you&#039;ve stopped by and I do hope you&#039;ll take a look around the blog, but I don&#039;t care to further defend that my use of the adverb is completely appropriate. My point was to provide a link to what I thought was an interesting perspective on the Sheffield ordeal. I support the campaign to keep the biblical studies dept. open. Perhaps I could have been clearer in the post with my word choice. Granted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie, I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;ve stopped by and I do hope you&#8217;ll take a look around the blog, but I don&#8217;t care to further defend that my use of the adverb is completely appropriate. My point was to provide a link to what I thought was an interesting perspective on the Sheffield ordeal. I support the campaign to keep the biblical studies dept. open. Perhaps I could have been clearer in the post with my word choice. Granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie louise fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie louise fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=748#comment-506</guid>
		<description>There are two meanings: declared but not proved, and doubtful or suspect.  &quot;Represented as existing or as being as described but not so proved; supposed.&quot;  The implication is that the source may not be authentic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two meanings: declared but not proved, and doubtful or suspect.  &#8220;Represented as existing or as being as described but not so proved; supposed.&#8221;  The implication is that the source may not be authentic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=748#comment-499</guid>
		<description>My goodness, folks... time to take a look at the dictionary:

&quot;Allegedly&quot; is an adverb built off the adjective &quot;alleged&quot; which might be defined as &quot;declared or stated to be as described.&quot; I simply used the word because of the uncertainty of the source. I don&#039;t think Jim is lying, but I&#039;m dependent on what is &quot;declared to be as described.&quot; While I admit in some contexts, the word can come to mean &quot;suspect&quot; or &quot;doubtful,&quot; I think it is clear that I didn&#039;t mean that here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My goodness, folks&#8230; time to take a look at the dictionary:</p>
<p>&#8220;Allegedly&#8221; is an adverb built off the adjective &#8220;alleged&#8221; which might be defined as &#8220;declared or stated to be as described.&#8221; I simply used the word because of the uncertainty of the source. I don&#8217;t think Jim is lying, but I&#8217;m dependent on what is &#8220;declared to be as described.&#8221; While I admit in some contexts, the word can come to mean &#8220;suspect&#8221; or &#8220;doubtful,&#8221; I think it is clear that I didn&#8217;t mean that here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie louise fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie louise fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=748#comment-494</guid>
		<description>yeah - same.  what&#039;s with the allegedly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah &#8211; same.  what&#8217;s with the allegedly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=748#comment-493</guid>
		<description>No Jim, I think the blogger is just being &quot;careful&quot; and using legalistic language to prevent a lawsuit (I see the owner of this blog is American, so it kind of makes sense). I know from first hand knowledge that you are not &quot;making it up&quot;. Back to FB ... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Jim, I think the blogger is just being &#8220;careful&#8221; and using legalistic language to prevent a lawsuit (I see the owner of this blog is American, so it kind of makes sense). I know from first hand knowledge that you are not &#8220;making it up&#8221;. Back to FB &#8230; <img src='http://www.sakeoftruth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/more-on-sheffield/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=748#comment-492</guid>
		<description>allegedly? really?  so i&#039;m just making it up- or lying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>allegedly? really?  so i&#8217;m just making it up- or lying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

