<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GCR Task Force: &#8220;Purpose is Not Seminary Funding&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/gcr-task-force-purpose-is-not-seminary-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/gcr-task-force-purpose-is-not-seminary-funding/</link>
	<description>Biblical Studies, Exegesis, Theology, etc. by Josh Mann</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/gcr-task-force-purpose-is-not-seminary-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=732#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I agree. My assumption is that someone has suggested that the presence of two seminary presidents on the task force will wind up with a committee that funnels money toward the seminaries. In any case, such a thought was totally off my radar, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. My assumption is that someone has suggested that the presence of two seminary presidents on the task force will wind up with a committee that funnels money toward the seminaries. In any case, such a thought was totally off my radar, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmichaelfox@sbcglobal.net</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/gcr-task-force-purpose-is-not-seminary-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>rmichaelfox@sbcglobal.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=732#comment-472</guid>
		<description>thanks for pointing out that link. i was a bit perplexed - i&#039;ve seen, heard, and read lots about the possibilities of downsizing the seminaries or putting GGBTS and MBTS under the mastery of southern and/or southwestern. so, to see him clarifying that sbc bigwigs are in fact not out to funnel money TO the seminaries was sort of odd. i don&#039;t get the rhetoric and maneuvering of our convention leaders sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for pointing out that link. i was a bit perplexed &#8211; i&#8217;ve seen, heard, and read lots about the possibilities of downsizing the seminaries or putting GGBTS and MBTS under the mastery of southern and/or southwestern. so, to see him clarifying that sbc bigwigs are in fact not out to funnel money TO the seminaries was sort of odd. i don&#8217;t get the rhetoric and maneuvering of our convention leaders sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

