<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan Wallace Comments on the Conservative Bible Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/dan-wallace-comments-on-the-conservative-bible-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/dan-wallace-comments-on-the-conservative-bible-project/</link>
	<description>Biblical Studies, Exegesis, Theology, etc. by Josh Mann</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/dan-wallace-comments-on-the-conservative-bible-project/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=788#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Exactly!  In my view, distinctions must be made or else the label &#039;conservative&#039; becomes virtually meaningless. I find similar issues with the label &#039;evangelical&#039; (especially the political sense!) and &#039;liberal&#039; (too often applied to anybody who disagrees).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!  In my view, distinctions must be made or else the label &#8216;conservative&#8217; becomes virtually meaningless. I find similar issues with the label &#8216;evangelical&#8217; (especially the political sense!) and &#8216;liberal&#8217; (too often applied to anybody who disagrees).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/dan-wallace-comments-on-the-conservative-bible-project/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=788#comment-549</guid>
		<description>wow, i don&#039;t even know where to start with this one. grape juice? bottles? 

here&#039;s a question to further this conversation. should this bible project be called the conservative bible project, or the fundamentalist bible project? as a conservative student at a  liberal school, i often long for more of a distinction between conservatism and fundamentalism. any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, i don&#8217;t even know where to start with this one. grape juice? bottles? </p>
<p>here&#8217;s a question to further this conversation. should this bible project be called the conservative bible project, or the fundamentalist bible project? as a conservative student at a  liberal school, i often long for more of a distinction between conservatism and fundamentalism. any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/dan-wallace-comments-on-the-conservative-bible-project/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=788#comment-548</guid>
		<description>I have no gurus, thank you. I found Wallace&#039;s comments interesting in light of his involvement in textual criticism and the NET Bible project (he served as the senior NT editor).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no gurus, thank you. I found Wallace&#8217;s comments interesting in light of his involvement in textual criticism and the NET Bible project (he served as the senior NT editor).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/dan-wallace-comments-on-the-conservative-bible-project/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=788#comment-547</guid>
		<description>whew, im glad he spoke up on it.  i was wondering when we would know whether the project was good or not and there&#039;s nothing like a timely comment to set things to rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whew, im glad he spoke up on it.  i was wondering when we would know whether the project was good or not and there&#8217;s nothing like a timely comment to set things to rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.sakeoftruth.com/2009/10/dan-wallace-comments-on-the-conservative-bible-project/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sakeoftruth.com/?p=788#comment-546</guid>
		<description>and it would only burst skins, not bottles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and it would only burst skins, not bottles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

