Skip to content


What I Love About Accordance

After using BibleWorks (~5 yrs), Logos (~4 yrs), and Accordance (~1.5 yrs), I have found all three programs to have distinctive advantages and disadvantages as compared to one another. While I hope to offer an in-depth comparison of all three in a couple of months, I now offer what I love about Accordance relative to the other programs:

  1. Accordance is easy to use right out of the box (and even more useable after picking up a few tips at a seminar or through their online tutorials).
  2. Similarly, Accordance (menus, searches, etc.) are very consistent in diverse situations. This brings the learning curve down quite a bit.
  3. Accordance has superior search results displays. One can customize results in lists and graphs with ease.
  4. Accordance maps are amazing. Map layers and 3-D features are two of my favorites.

Now I recognize that Logos and BibleWorks are capable of some of these same features, but I find Accordance to be superior in these respects. More on the strengths of Logos and BibleWorks in the future.

Related Posts:

Posted in Technology.

Tagged with , , , , .


2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Donovan says

    I think this is a fair assessment. I use Logos as well, and for being a seminary level commentary and reference library, it is fantastic. The exegetical and passage guide reports are also useful to do a quick work up on a word or verse.

    That said, the Accordance user interface is much more intuitive and elegant out of the box for work flow. The mapping system is as far as I know, not equaled by anyone at this stage.

  2. John Mark Harris says

    I’m an Accordance user – mostly because I have to be. My computer is a 4 year old MAC :-) I love Accordance, I just wish they would have more titles. I believe their search and user interface is the best, but they don’t even have BDF. Come on people! I’d also love Baker Exegetical Commentary.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.